The Minneapolis Star Tribune Says "No" to Fournier Spin

Over the weekend I asked if the Associated Press' Washington Bureau Chief Ron Fournier, who previously held months of talks with the McCain campaign about taking a senior level position with the committee, was moonlighting for the McCain campaign. In short, an "analysis" piece by Fournier read like straight talking points for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

Both MoveOn and FireDogLake launched action items to try to pressure both the AP and its subscribers to act responsibly with regards to Fournier and force him to recuse himself from covering the Presidential campaign. At least one newspaper, the Star Tribute of Minneapolis and St. Paul, took notice, and although they were not particularly happy to have been inundated by the emails from MoveOn members, they seemed to agree with the sentiment.

Having said that, these letter writers raise a legitimate point. Fournier was in discussions about joining the McCain campaign and was pretty cozy with Karl Rove while he was still in the White House. So when he wrote in a news analysis that that the selection of Joe Biden as Barack Obama's running mate showed a lack of "self-confidence," I wonder who was doing the analysis: the AP bureau chief or the man romanced by the McCain campaign?

If he were writing for the opinion page, no problem. As the head of the AP's most important bureau -- directing reporters and determining coverage - it's troubling.

It's time for the AP to own up to its mistake and tell Fournier to either recuse himself or step down from his position. There's already one Fox News in the world -- we don't need another one sending stories over its wires to every newspaper in the world.



Display:


The Tribune is a good paper (none / 0)

I think they do a pretty good job, all told.  That said, they do rely on the AP quite a lot; they don't really have strong national or international bureaus, being a local operation.

Editorially, they're quite strong; they publish opinions from both sides of the aisle, but their in-house columns are common-sense liberal.  I rarely feel the urge to write in and complain.

Anyways, kudos to MoveOn for being obnoxious... better living through irritation!


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 01:39:11 PM EST

Re: The Tribune is a good paper (none / 0)

Did you see that the strib is actually dropping its AP service in two years?


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 01:47:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Heard a rumor (none / 0)

Hadn't seen it confirmed, but yeah.  They'll probably go to Reuters or something.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 02:33:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Never in my life (none / 0)

Have I seen so many supposed journalists look so totally over the top unprofessional and biased, as I have this election.  


by RichardFlatts on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 01:42:26 PM EST

We lifted up the rock (none / 0)

Now all the insects are crawling out.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 02:34:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Pot: Meet Kettle (none / 0)

I really have a problem with Left bloggers yelling "bias" at Fournier -- very hypocritical, especially when you want to be considered respected "new" journalists!

I read Fournier's analysis and frankly wondered what the big effing deal was. I've seen far worse "analysis" and opinions written in the blogosphere; far worse.

Such behavior on your part reminds me of high school students who can't or won't grow up and accept your responsibility to act like that which you wanna be: real journalists.

If shouting at Fournier/AP for such a tepid analysis makes you feel better, go ahead. But just remember that it doesn't make you look like professionals and it diminishes your significance.


by mabelle55 on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 05:29:26 PM EST

Re: Pot: Meet Kettle (none / 0)

No. The difference is that we are completely open about our biases. I am a Democratic partisan. Fournier, by comparison, hid the fact that he held months of talks with the McCain campaign about taking a senior-level position.


My Direct Democracy
by Jonathan Singer on Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 11:49:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.